Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZimmerman, Peta-Anne
dc.contributor.authorMason, Matt
dc.contributor.editorBrett Mitchell
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-18
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-13T03:19:12Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-02T00:58:52Z
dc.date.available2015-05-13T03:19:12Z
dc.date.available2017-03-02T00:58:52Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/67891
dc.description.abstractIntroduction “The Walking Dead. Scientific name Homo Coprophagus Somnambulus. A deceased human being who has partially returned to life due to undeterminable causes.” The Urban Dictionary. Wikipedia currently lists 383 feature length “A-list” zombie films, released between 1932 and 2014. These films indicate a number of causes of “zombification” including a microbial agent which has not been contained and spreads readily from person to person. Given this situation, it is pertinent to explore how the infection prevention and control (IPC) community can best capitalise upon this pop culture phenomenon. Method A search of feature length films, in English, released from 2000-2014 was conducted. Each film was checked against the public online databases iMDB, Rotten Tomatoes and Wikipedia to identify the cause of the zombie infestation featured in each film. To understand the role and impact of zombie films in pop culture, a search of peer-reviewed journals, published in English, was conducted, with no date limitations. Search terms included “infection control”, “zombie” and “film”. Results On review of the films included on the Wikipedia list, 238 zombie films were released from 2000 to date. Of these 69 films had an infectious cause of some kind (viral, bacterial, parasite, extraterrestrial, zoonotic or other biological cause). For 48 films, the cause is unclear. In the remainder (n=121), zombification has no traceable infectious cause. Preliminary results indicate that pop culture is influenced by global health issues resulting in an increase in the release of infectious biohorror films in the years following outbreaks such as SARS and pandemic influenza. Discussion The use of pop culture to initiate innovation in science is well recognised. Subsequently this can be extrapolated for use in the development and adoption of IPC practice in both public health and acute care settings. Conclusion There are clear indications that contemporary IPC technologies are evident in these films, successful or not. Using contemporary cultural influences allows healthcare workers and the public to contextualise IPC theory and practice in an accessible and memorable way.
dc.description.peerreviewedNo
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.publisher.urihttps://www.acipc.org.au/education/national-conference/2014-conference-adelaide
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameAustralasian College for Infection Prevention and Control Annual Conference
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleAustralasian College for Infection Prevention and Control
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2014-11-23
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2015-11-26
dc.relation.ispartoflocationAdelaide
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMedical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode119999
dc.titleCricket bats and containment: Can zombie pop culture be used to improve infection prevention and control practices?
dc.typeConference output
dc.type.descriptionE3 - Conferences (Extract Paper)
dc.type.codee3
gro.facultyGriffith Health Faculty
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorZimmerman, Peta-Anne P.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record