• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • An Analysis of the Zero-Crossing Method for Choosing Regularisation Parameters

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    19267_1.pdf (228.7Kb)
    Author(s)
    Johnston, PR
    Gulrajani, RM
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Johnston, Peter R.
    Year published
    2002
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Solving discrete ill-posed problems via Tikhonov regularization introduces the problem of determining a regularization parameter. There are several methods available for choosing such a parameter, yet, in general, the uniqueness of this choice is an open question. Two empirical methods for determining a regularization parameter (which appear in the biomedical engineering literature) are the composite residual and smoothing operator and the zero-crossing method. An equivalence is established between the zero-crossing method and a minimum product criterion, which has previously been linked with the L-curve method. Finally, the ...
    View more >
    Solving discrete ill-posed problems via Tikhonov regularization introduces the problem of determining a regularization parameter. There are several methods available for choosing such a parameter, yet, in general, the uniqueness of this choice is an open question. Two empirical methods for determining a regularization parameter (which appear in the biomedical engineering literature) are the composite residual and smoothing operator and the zero-crossing method. An equivalence is established between the zero-crossing method and a minimum product criterion, which has previously been linked with the L-curve method. Finally, the uniqueness of a choice of regularization parameter is established under certain restrictions on the Fourier coefficients of the data in the ill-posed problem.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
    Volume
    24
    Issue
    2
    Publisher URI
    http://www.siam.org/journals/sisc.php
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827500373516
    Copyright Statement
    © 2002 SIAM. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.
    Subject
    Applied mathematics
    Numerical and computational mathematics
    Theory of computation
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/6997
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander