Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPatapan, Haigen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T12:47:49Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T12:47:49Z
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.date.modified2009-11-20T05:17:40Z
dc.identifier.issn10361146en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10361140220148124en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/7119
dc.description.abstractThis article provides a general political review of recent High Court decisions that have significant implications for Australian constitutionalism. In examining the Court's judgments on issues such as cross-vesting schemes, immigration and Native Title, it seeks to articulate major themes in the Court's jurisprudence and delineate the important and changing role of the High Court in Australian politics. The article is the first in what this journal intends to be an annual review of the High Court from a political-science perspective.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherAustralian Political Studies Associationen_US
dc.publisher.placeAustraliaen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/10361146.aspen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom241en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto254en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAustralian Journal of Political Scienceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume37en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode360101en_US
dc.titleHigh Court Review 2001: Politics, Legalism and the Gleeson Court.en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Business School, School of Government and International Relationsen_US
gro.date.issued2002
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record