Show simple item record

dc.contributor.convenorEuropean Consortium for Political Researchen_AU
dc.contributor.authorHindmarsh, Richarden_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T08:09:50Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T08:09:50Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.date.modified2008-02-01T06:51:58Z
dc.identifier.doihttp://www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr/events/jointsessions/paperarchive/granada/ws16/Hindmarsh.pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/8682
dc.description.abstractThis paper maps out evolving forms of biopolitics in Australia in the context of environmental problems, specifically with regard to the environmental release of genetically modified organisms, and the challenge of emergent international trends towards citizen participation. Conditioning that challenge in Australia is a powerful biopolitical elite that empowers laboratories and expert 'committees of containment' 'outside nature', to discipline, manage and align society to the redesign of its biophysical environment through genetic engineering and biotechnology. 'Biopolitics' is thus situated here within both cultural and technological meanings and possible socio-political transformations of governance, in which new forms of governance represent variants of 'partnership' natural resource management approaches and mega-technological change situated within discourses of risk, uncertainty and trust, with the latter tempered by the complex and unique conditions of the 'life politics'. Australia's reliance on technocratic forms of governance has placed it far behind the fertile development of new life sciences governance forms in the European Union, and other countries like New Zealand, yet signs are emergent of support amongst science practitioners/communicators of a need to embrace the new political modes that seek mutually supportive stakeholder decision-making. Although long resistance to public participation by the bioelite suggests limited efforts to grasp such transformations, a paradox is suggested by the development of globalspeak, a policy narrative of global integration that Australian interests have long used to gain legitimacy and support for biodevelopment. Australia may thus be caught in the dilemma of the global nature of the 'bioeconomy' and its new biopolitics of community engagement to stay in the race. Such possibilities offer support for situating the notion of 'green' 'biopolitics' on the frontline of theoretical usefulness for democratic advances with regard to industrial development and notions of reflexive modernisation, or ecological democracy, for example.en_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherEuropean Consortium for Political Researchen_US
dc.publisher.placehttp://www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr/events/jointsessions/paperarchive/granada/ws16/Hindmarsh.pdfen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameTheoretical Perspectives in Policy Analysisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleTheoretical Perspectives in Policy Analysisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2005-04-14en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2005-04-19en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationGranada, Spainen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode360104en_US
dc.titleGreen Biopolitics and the Molecular Reordering of Natureen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE2 - Conference Publications (Non HERDC Eligible)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith School of Environmenten_US
gro.date.issued2005
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record