Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPalutikof, Jean P
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, Jon
dc.contributor.authorBoulter, Sarah L
dc.contributor.authorRissik, David
dc.contributor.editorPalutikof, JP
dc.contributor.editorBoulter, SL
dc.contributor.editorBarnett, J
dc.contributor.editorRissik, D
dc.description.abstractThis chapter seeks to draw together the overarching themes from the contributions to this book, and does so through the development of four arguments. The first argument is that the Australian experience with adaptation policy and research is of global relevance. The second argument is that adaptation to climate change is not happening, even if one might disagree about its effectiveness and whether it is happening in the right locations and institutions. The third argument is that there is limited utility and probably only confusion offered by the increasing classification of types of adaptation, for example, as being ‘autonomous’ or ‘evolutionary’ in nature. The fourth argument is that adaptation cannot be said to be a ‘science’; rather, it is a complex interdisciplinary field of inquiry whose ultimate rationale must include delivering policy-relevant information to decision-makers. The chapter uses many examples from Australia to illustrate the points made.
dc.publisherWiley Blackwell
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom
dc.relation.ispartofbooktitleApplied studies in climate adaptation
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEnvironmental management not elsewhere classified
dc.titleAdaptation as a field of research and practice: notes from the frontiers of adaptation
dc.typeBook chapter
dc.type.descriptionB1 - Chapters
dc.type.codeB - Book Chapters
gro.facultyOther, Other
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorPalutikof, Jean

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Book chapters
    Contains book chapters authored by Griffith authors.

Show simple item record