Learning by Doing: Employer Expectations of Planning Studio Education
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Johnson, Laurel
Darchen, Sébastien
Yang, Katie
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Planning education is often criticised for being “too theoretical” and subsequently producing graduates who lack the requisite technical skills for the job market—who, in other words, are not “work ready.” It is assumed that employers will prefer graduates with technical and procedural know-how. This article reports on an employer workshop to evaluate the urban planning studio courses at the University of Queensland in Australia. The results were surprising. The attending employers agreed that procedural planning skills can be learned “on the job” while the university environment is an opportunity to develop critical and spatial thinking.
Journal Title
Urban Policy and Research
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
36
Issue
1
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Urban Policy and Research, 36 (1), pp. 11-19, 22 Aug 2016, copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2016.1221814
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Urban and regional planning
Human geography
Policy and administration
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Pojani, D; Johnson, L; Darchen, S; Yang, K, Learning by Doing: Employer Expectations of Planning Studio Education, Urban Policy and Research, 2018, 36 (1), pp. 11-19