Two Faces of Strategic Argumentation in the Law

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Accepted Manuscript (AM)

Author(s)
Governatori, Guido
Olivieri, Francesco
Rotolo, Antonino
Scannapieco, Simone
Sartor, Giovanni
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)

Hoekstra, R

Date
2014
Size
File type(s)
Location

Krakow, Poland

License
Abstract

In strategic argumentation players exchange arguments to prove or reject a claim. This paper discusses and reports on research about two basic issues regarding the game-theoretic understanding of strategic argumentation games in the law: whether such games can be reasonably modelled as zero-sum games and as games with complete information.

Journal Title
Conference Title

Legal Knowledge and Information Systems

Book Title
Edition
Volume

271

Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2014 IOS Press. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the publisher website for access to the definitive, published version.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Theory of computation

Information systems

Science & Technology

Social Sciences

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Governatori, G; Olivieri, F; Rotolo, A; Scannapieco, S; Sartor, G, Two Faces of Strategic Argumentation in the Law, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2014, 271, pp. 81-90