Strengthening emergency department response to chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear disasters: A scoping review

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Ranse, Jamie
Mackie, Benjamin
Crilly, Julia
Heslop, David
Wilson, Bridget
Mitchell, Marion
Weber, Sarah
Watkins, Nathan
Sharpe, Joseph
Handy, Michael
Hertelendy, Attila
Currie, Jane
Hammad, Karen
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2024
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract

Introduction Natural hazards resulting in disasters are increasing globally, impacting communities and disrupting industries. In addition to planning for these natural hazard disasters, emergency departments (EDs) should prepare for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) incidents that result in surges of patient presentations. Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear incidents differ in preparedness to natural hazards, requiring an understanding of patient management and health system-related challenges.

Methods This scoping review used the Arksey and O’Malley five-step framework. Manuscripts were retrieved from four databases and search engines using keywords relating to impacts on the ED from real world CBRN event(s). Analysis focused on the characteristics of CBRN event, ED impact, and lessons learnt against four surge capacity domains that including staff, stuff, space, and systems.

Results A total of 44 paper were included in this review. Most of the incidents were chemical in nature (n = 36/44, 81.8 %). The majority of CBRN incidents were accidental (n = 34/44, 77.3 %). Between 1 and 1470 people (Mdn=56, IQR: 18–228) presented to an ED from each event. Most patients were discharged from the ED, but this was variably reported. Some key lessons related to secondary exposure to ED staff, repurposing spaces, and coordination of CBRN incidents.

Conclusion With the increasing number of CBRN incidents, strategies to strengthen EDs and limit the impact from a surge in patient presentations are paramount. An understanding of local CBRN risk to inform a top-hazards approach to CBRN preparedness, and the implementation of pre-emptive CBRN clinical pathways is recommended. Additionally, strategies should be implemented to protect staff from the risk of secondary exposure to a CBRN event. These strategies may include adequate education, training, and personal protective equipment for staff.

Journal Title

Australasian Emergency Care

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of College of Emergency Nursing Australasia. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Item Access Status
Note

This publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advance online version.

Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Emergency medicine

Clinical sciences

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Ranse, J; Mackie, B; Crilly, J; Heslop, D; Wilson, B; Mitchell, M; Weber, S; Watkins, N; Sharpe, J; Handy, M; Hertelendy, A; Currie, J; Hammad, K, Strengthening emergency department response to chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear disasters: A scoping review, Australasian Emergency Care, 2024

Collections