A randomised trial of a psychosocial intervention for depressed cancer patients integrated into routine care

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Turner, Jane
Kelly, Brian
Clarke, David
Yates, Patsy
Aranda, Sanchia
Forbes, Andrew
Hargraves, Maryanne
Chambers, Suzanne
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2015
Size
File type(s)
Location

Washington, DC, USA

License
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Barriers to the integration of psychosocial care into routine cancer care include limited access to services and concerns about stigma. This study aimed to evaluate a model of care in which patients who screened positive for depression received a brief tailored psychosocial intervention embedded in routine clinical care, delivered by frontline health professionals. METHODS: In the stepped wedge design, participating sites were randomly allocated from Control to Training then Intervention conditions. Thirty-seven health professionals completed manual-based training and skill development before delivering up to four therapy sessions to 70 patients with HADS scores of 8 to 21. The primary outcome was difference in HADS scores from baseline to 10-week follow-up. Secondary outcomes were quality of life (FACT-G; EQ-5D), supportive care needs (Supportive Care Needs Survey), and Demoralisation (Demoralisation Scale). RESULTS: Baseline measures were obtained for 469 patients. The majority were female (70%) and married, and 32.8% had advanced disease. Mean HADS scores were 8.8 (SD = 6.30) and 8.6 (SD5.90) for Intervention and Control groups, respectively (p = 0.59). At follow-up, there was no significance difference in total HADS scores between Control and Intervention groups. Higher baseline depression score was predictive of improvement (p<0.001). Improvement in anxiety was predicted by higher baseline anxiety score (p<0.001) and lower FACT functional well-being score (p<0.001). Patients with advanced disease were more likely than those with early disease to experience reduction in supportive care needs. CONCLUSIONS: Frontline health professionals can provide psychosocial care, but interventions should target those most likely to benefit rather than being generically applied. Research Implications: These results provide preliminary evidence of the characteristics of patients who are most likely to benefit from a brief psychosocial intervention integrated into clinical care. Further analysis is required of the specific types of therapy which are most likely to be of benefit for depressed cancer patients. Practice Implications: Integration of psychosocial care into routine cancer care can be achieved through a model of care in which frontline health professionals who have participated in focused training and skill development provide brief tailored therapy.

Journal Title
Conference Title

Psycho‐Oncology

Book Title
Edition
Volume

24

Issue

S2

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Clinical sciences

Oncology and carcinogenesis

Science & Technology

Social Sciences

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Oncology

Psychology

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Turner, J; Kelly, B; Clarke, D; Yates, P; Aranda, S; Forbes, A; Hargraves, M; Chambers, S, A randomised trial of a psychosocial intervention for depressed cancer patients integrated into routine care, Psycho‐Oncology, 2015, 24 (S2), pp. 62-63