Medical Negligence, Causation and Liability for Non-disclosure of Risk: A Post-Wallace Framework and Critique

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Carver, Tracey
Smith, Malcolm K
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2014
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

It is well-established under the Australian law of negligence that medical practitioners owe a comprehensive duty of care to patients. The duty encompasses all aspects of their role and requires practitioners to take reasonable care in the provision of diagnosis, treatment, and information and advice.1 In respect of the latter part of this duty, the High Court in Rogers v Whitaker imposed an obligation upon practitioners to disclose to patients all material risks inherent in undergoing or forgoing surgery or other interventions.2

Journal Title

UNSW Law Journal

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

37

Issue

3

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Other law and legal studies

Law and legal studies

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Smith, M; Carver, T, Medical Negligence, Causation and Liability for Non-disclosure of Risk: A Post-Wallace Framework and Critique, UNSW Law Journal, 2014, 37 (3), pp. 972-1018

Collections