Testing knowledge: Weapons reviews of autonomous weapons systems and the international criminal trial
File version
Author(s)
McKenzie, Simon
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Palmer, Emma
Harris Rimmer, Susan
Bikundo, Edwin
Clark, Martin
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
A recurring theme of the debate about the development and use of autonomous weapon systems (AWS) into the future is how to ensure accountability for their use. There is a fear that in the future an AWS might be involved in a serious violation of international law but that no one could be held responsible for that violation. This has led many scholars to propose ways to bridge the perceived gap between the decisions of the operator of the system and targets selected by the device.
The chapter contributes to this debate by considering how the legal obligation of states to carry out a weapons review links with the high threshold that has been set for individual criminal responsibility for crimes triable before the International Criminal Court (ICC). It shows the importance of testing in the development and acquisition of AWS and how testing and its documentation through legal review are important ways of promoting accountability for the use of AWS.
Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title
Futures of International Criminal Justice
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Criminology
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Massingham, E; McKenzie, S, Testing knowledge: Weapons reviews of autonomous weapons systems and the international criminal trial, Futures of International Criminal Justice, 2021, pp. 177-197