‘I Did Not Say That I Would Just Have to Swear in Court and It Would Be Alright’: Police Verballing Practices in Queensland Courts, 1926–61
File version
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Trends in large-scale historical data reveal continuities and changes in the prosecution process that might otherwise pass unnoticed. A significant trend emerging from the Prosecution Project database is the dramatic acceleration of early guilty pleas in Queensland's Supreme Court from the late 1940s. An examination of detectives’ testimony provides unique evidence of the police investigation and interrogation practices underpinning this phenomenon. Confession evidence dominated the police prosecution case during this period, specifically verbal confessions. A close reading of these texts suggests that some Queensland police engaged in police ‘verballing’ practices much earlier than identified by the Fitzgerald Inquiry into police corruption. I argue that process corruption had tangible results by transforming the prosecution process from an adversarial to a guilty plea system.
Journal Title
Australian Historical Studies
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
51
Issue
3
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Historical studies
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Durnian, L, ‘I Did Not Say That I Would Just Have to Swear in Court and It Would Be Alright’: Police Verballing Practices in Queensland Courts, 1926–61, Australian Historical Studies, 2020, 51 (3), pp. 250-265