How Well Do Perioperative Practitioners Implement Pressure Injury Prevention Guidelines? An Observational Study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Wang, I
Walker, R
Gillespie, BM
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2018
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Background: Perioperative pressure injury (PI) remains problematic. Five key pressure injury prevention (PIP) strategies were identified according to literature. However, little is known about current perioperative PIP practice in compliance to international guidelines. Methods: This study describes perioperative health care practitioners’ implementation of five key PIP strategies in compliance with international PIP guidelines in a tertiary hospital. This was achieved via observation of the implementation of PIP strategies using a structured data collection tool and skin inspection on postoperative day 2. Results: Seventy-three patients undergoing surgical procedures were recruited. Of these, 36 were identified as at-risk of developing PI based on the Waterlow risk assessment. The number of PIP strategies implemented across the sample ranged from 27 to 49 strategies; and increased according to risk, with high-risk patients receiving more PIP strategies than those patients at moderaterisk, although this finding was statistically non-significant.

Journal Title

Wound Practice and Research

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

26

Issue

1

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2018 AWMA. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Nursing

Acute care

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections