Assuming Responsibility for Justice in the context of South Africa’s refugee receiving regime

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Holscher, Dorothee
Bozalek, Vivienne G
Zembylas, Michalinos
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2014
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

This paper explores Iris Marion Young's social connection model of responsibility for justice. Its purpose is to contribute to the development of an ethics of responsibility for social work and other caring professions. Our arguments are grounded in an auto-ethnographic study conducted in 2008 by one of the authors while practicing as a social worker with a South African refugee services provider. We ask: What did it mean for the care workers to respond justly to refugees in the light of the complex structural and other constraints that circumscribed their work? What constituted the relationship between individual and collective responsibility in this response? We propose that developing an ethics of responsibility requires us to pay attention to the intricate processes which translate structural injustices into social care settings, and to the dynamics which cause them to be either reproduced or resisted. Our explorations show how Young's social connection model can make a valuable contribution to conceptualisations of what responsibility for justice means, and what actions this implies. We conclude that such an approach could be helpful whenever care workers seek to promote social justice in responses to the very structural injustices within which they are implicated.

Journal Title

Ethics and Social Welfare

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

8

Issue

2

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Criminology

Social work

Applied ethics

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Holscher, D; Bozalek, VG; Zembylas, M, Assuming Responsibility for Justice in the context of South Africa’s refugee receiving regime, Ethics and Social Welfare, 2014, 8 (2), pp. 187-204

Collections