Planning and development dilemmas in a minority government: Restoring community or held to ransom?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
England, Philippa
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2016
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

In January 2015, the Queensland Labor Party ousted the Newman government from power in a spectacular yet ultimately uncertain election result. The ALP won 44 seats, one short of forming a majority government but went on to form a minority government with the support of the independent member, Peter Wellington. In the electoral campaign the ALP had promised to form a “listening government” that would restore honesty, accountability and transparency to government. This article questions whether this “collaborative governance” policy agenda can realistically be met by a government whose hold on power is so weak. In order to answer this question, the article first summarises the legacy of the Newman government with respect to planning and environmental matters. It then reviews the policy and law-making style of the new government in three areas: major urban development projects; the 2015 planning Bills and proposed reform of land clearing laws. It examines the range of pressures, political and otherwise, that confront a well-intentioned and reformist government. It concludes that, while there has been some progress, the Palaszczuk government is “battling the odds” to reap reform and not just because of its numbers in Parliament. While a consultative approach is particularly valuable for a minority government, it is not in itself a sufficient solution to the dilemmas of planning and environmental governance.

Journal Title

Environmental and Planning Law Journal

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

33

Issue

1

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2016 Thomson Reuters. This article was first published by Thomson Reuters in the Environmental and Planning law journal and should be cited as Philippa England, Planning and development dilemmas in a minority government: Restoring community or held to ransom?, (2016) 33 EPLJ 31. For all subscription inquiries please phone, from Australia: 1300 304 195, from Overseas: +61 2 8587 7980 or online at legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/search. The official PDF version of this article can also be purchased separately from Thomson Reuters at http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/subscribe-or-purchase.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Political science

Environmental management not elsewhere classified

Urban and regional planning

Policy and administration

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections