Who to Refer for Speech Therapy at 4 Years of Age Versus Who to "Watch and Wait"?
File version
Author(s)
Eecen, Kyriaki Ttofari
Pezic, Angela
Brommeyer, Katherine
Mei, Cristina
Eadie, Patricia
Reilly, Sheena
Dodd, Barbara
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Objective:
To examine predictors of speech disorder resolution versus persistence at age 7 years in children with speech errors at age 4 years.
Study design:
Participants were drawn from a longitudinal, community cohort. Assessment at age 4 years (N = 1494) identified children with speech errors. Reassessment at age 7 years allowed categorization into resolved or persistent categories. Logistic regression examined predictors of speech outcome, including family history, sex, socioeconomic status, nonverbal intelligence, and speech error type (delay vs disorder).
Results:
At age 7 years, persistent errors were seen in over 40% of children who had errors at age 4 years. Speech symptomatology was the only significant predictor of outcome (P = .02). Children with disordered errors at age 4 years were twice as likely to have poor speech outcomes at age 7 years compared with those with delayed errors.
Conclusions:
Children with speech delay at age 4 years seem more likely to resolve, and this might justify a “watch and wait” approach. In contrast, those with speech disorder at age 4 years appear to be at greater risk for persistent difficulties, and could be prioritized for therapy to offset long-term impacts.
Journal Title
Journal of Pediatrics
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
185
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Paediatrics
Sports science and exercise