From BIS to binge: The role of negative affect in the pathway between personality and binge eating
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Loxton, Natalie J
O'Donovan, Analise
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Recent research has highlighted the utility of using revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) to further understand the individual differences that influence binge eating behaviours. The current study draws on both RST and theoretical models that implicate negative affect in binge eating, with the aim of identifying indirect pathways between individual differences in RST systems and binge eating as mediated through negative affect. Undergraduate students (n = 229, M = 22.67 years of age, SD = 8.95, 76% female) completed self-report measures of revised reinforcement sensitivities, negative affect and binge eating symptoms. Bootstrapped tests of indirect effects showed that negative affect mediated the pathway between the Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS) and binge eating symptoms. Additionally, negative affect mediated the pathway between rash impulsivity and binge eating symptoms. This study supports and extends previous research by highlighting the experience of negative affect as a possible mechanism through which heightened BIS and rash impulsivity leads to binge eating.
Journal Title
Eating Behaviors
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
41
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Other human society
Psychology
Applied and developmental psychology
Clinical and health psychology
Social and personality psychology
Affect
Anxiety
Binge eating
Impulsivity
Personality
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Wilson, DR; Loxton, NJ; O'Donovan, A, From BIS to binge: The role of negative affect in the pathway between personality and binge eating, Eating Behaviors, 2021, 41, pp. 101479