Should trainees work prospectively towards achieving a Scholarly Project exemption by publication? (Letter)
File version
Author(s)
Darabian, Kaveh
Emeleus, Mary
Scott, James G
Cutbush, Jimsie
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Dear Sir,
The RANZCP Scholarly Project requirements involve submission of a proposal to the local Branch Training Committee for approval and the submission of a 3000- to 5000-word report to the College following project completion.1 In Queensland, two psychiatrists with relevant academic expertise complete the proposal assessment; this assessment aims to safeguard against trainees commencing projects that are unfeasible or unlikely to meet the requirements. Based on the outcome of the proposal assessment, feedback and support are provided to the trainee, who can modify the proposal with a view to ensuring success.
Journal Title
Australasian Psychiatry
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
27
Issue
3
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Psychiatry (incl. psychotherapy)
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Psychology
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Psychiatry
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Parker, S; Darabian, K; Emeleus, M; Scott, JG; Cutbush, J, Should trainees work prospectively towards achieving a Scholarly Project exemption by publication? (Letter), Australasian Psychiatry, 2019, 27 (3), pp. 313-314