The unfinished business of colonisation
No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Galloway, Kate
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Last week the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in Love and Thoms v The Commonwealth. As reported here in December, the plaintiffs, Daniel Love and Brendan Thoms, are both non-citizen Aboriginal men who have lived in Australia since they were young. The government tried to deport them because they each have a criminal record. The men appealed against their deportation, arguing that the government did not have the power to deport them under the constitution.
Journal Title
Eureka Street
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
30
Issue
3
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and the law
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Galloway, K, The unfinished business of colonisation, Eureka Street, 2020, 30 (3)