A mixed-methods study measuring the effectiveness of a menstrual health intervention on menstrual health knowledge, perceptions and practices among young women in Zimbabwe
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Weiss, Helen A
Larsson, Leyla Sophie
Bandason, Tsitsi
Redzo, Nicol
Dauya, Ethel
Nzanza, Tafadzwa
Ishumael, Pauline
Gweshe, Nancy
Ndlovu, Precious
Dziva Chikwari, Chido
Mavodza, Constancia Vimbayi
Renju, Jenny
Francis, Suzanna C
Ferrand, Rashida
et al.
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: While integral to women's physical and mental well-being, achieving good menstrual health (MH) remains a challenge for many women. This study investigated the effectiveness of a comprehensive MH intervention on menstrual knowledge, perceptions and practices among women aged 16-24 years in Harare, Zimbabwe. DESIGN: A mixed-methods prospective cohort study with pre-post evaluation of an MH intervention. SETTING: Two intervention clusters in Harare, Zimbabwe. PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 303 female participants were recruited, of whom 189 (62.4%) were seen at midline (median follow-up 7.0; IQR 5.8-7.7 months) and 184 (60.7%) were seen at endline (median follow-up 12.4; IQR 11.9-13.8 months). Cohort follow-up was greatly affected by COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions. INTERVENTION: The MH intervention provided MH education and support, analgesics, and a choice of menstrual products in a community-based setting to improve MH outcomes among young women in Zimbabwe. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Effectiveness of a comprehensive MH intervention on improving MH knowledge, perceptions, and practices among young women over time. Quantitative questionnaire data were collected at baseline, midline, and endline. At endline, thematic analysis of four focus group discussions was used to further explore participants' menstrual product use and experiences of the intervention. RESULTS: At midline, more participants had correct/positive responses for MH knowledge (adjusted OR (aOR)=12.14; 95% CI: 6.8 to 21.8), perceptions (aOR=2.85; 95% CI: 1.6 to 5.1) and practices for reusable pads (aOR=4.68; 95% CI: 2.3 to 9.6) than at baseline. Results were similar comparing endline with baseline for all MH outcomes. Qualitative findings showed that sociocultural norms, stigma and taboos around menstruation, and environmental factors such as limited access to water, sanitation and hygiene facilities affected the effect of the intervention on MH outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention improved MH knowledge, perceptions and practices among young women in Zimbabwe, and the comprehensive nature of the intervention was key to this. MH interventions should address interpersonal, environmental and societal factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03719521.
Journal Title
BMJ Open
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
13
Issue
3
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Nursing
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Health sciences
Psychology
public health
qualitative research
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Tembo, M; Weiss, HA; Larsson, LS; Bandason, T; Redzo, N; Dauya, E; Nzanza, T; Ishumael, P; Gweshe, N; Ndlovu, P; Dziva Chikwari, C; Mavodza, CV; Renju, J; Francis, SC; Ferrand, R; et al., A mixed-methods study measuring the effectiveness of a menstrual health intervention on menstrual health knowledge, perceptions and practices among young women in Zimbabwe, BMJ Open, 2023, 13 (3), pp. e067897