O 107 - Impact of subject-specific musculoskeletal geometry on estimated joint kinematics, joint kinetics and muscle forces in typically developing children
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Wesseling, M
Pitto, L
Falisse, A
Van Rossom, S
Van Campenhout, A
De Groote, F
Desloovere, K
Carty, Christopher
Jonkers, I
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
1.. Introduction:
Gait analysis together with musculoskeletal modeling can be used to calculate muscle forces and assess pathological gait [1]. No generic, pediatric musculoskeletal models are available and, therefore, linear scaling methods are commonly used to personalize a generic, adult musculoskeletal model to the child’s anthropometry. 2. Research:
How different are joint kinematics, joint kinetics and muscle force estimates of generic scaled models compared to medical-imaging based models in typically developing (TD) children? 3. Methods:
3D motion capture data and magnetic resonance images (MRI) of a TD boy (age: 8 years; height: 1.23 m; weight: 20.4 kg) were collected. Two musculoskeletal OpenSim models were created: (1) a scaled generic model (M_gen), and (2) a MRI-based model, which included subject-specific musculoskeletal geometry (M_mri) [2]. Joint kinematics, joint kinetics and muscle forces were calculated for each model using OpenSim 3.3 [3]. Joint kinematics, joint kinetics, muscle force waveforms, as well as femoral anteversion angle, neck-shaft angle and hip joint centre location were compared between both models. 4. Results:
Joint kinematics and joint kinetics were surprisingly similar between the M_gen and M_mri with root-mean-square-differences below 2.8° and 0.05Nm/kg for joint angles and moments, respectively (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). Depending on the analyzed muscle, differences in muscle forces varied substantially (up to 230% difference) between the M_gen and M_mri (Fig. 3). Femoral anteversion and neck-shaft angles differed between M_gen and M_mri by 12 and 5 degrees, respectively. The hip joint centre position differed between both models by 5, 15 and 6 mm in the anterior/posterior, superior/inferior and medial/lateral direction, respectively.
Journal Title
Gait & Posture
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
65
Issue
Supplement 1
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2018 Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Mechanical engineering
Clinical sciences
Clinical sciences not elsewhere classified
Sports science and exercise