Towards a better characterisation of deep-diving whales' distributions by using prey distribution model outputs?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Virgili, Auriane
Hedon, Laura
Authier, Matthieu
Calmettes, Beatriz
Claridge, Diane
Cole, Tim
Corkeron, Peter
Doremus, Ghislain
Dunn, Charlotte
Dunn, Tim E
Laran, Sophie
Lehodey, Patrick
Lewis, Mark
Louzao, Maite
Mannocci, Laura
et al.
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)

Paiva, Vitor Hugo Rodrigues

Date
2021
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract

In habitat modelling, environmental variables are assumed to be proxies of lower trophic levels distribution and by extension, of marine top predator distributions. More proximal variables, such as potential prey fields, could refine relationships between top predator distributions and their environment. In situ data on prey distributions are not available over large spatial scales but, a numerical model, the Spatial Ecosystem And POpulation DYnamics Model (SEAPODYM), provides simulations of the biomass and production of zooplankton and six functional groups of micronekton at the global scale. Here, we explored whether generalised additive models fitted to simulated prey distribution data better predicted deep-diver densities (here beaked whales Ziphiidae and sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus) than models fitted to environmental variables. We assessed whether the combination of environmental and prey distribution data would further improve model fit by comparing their explanatory power. For both taxa, results were suggestive of a preference for habitats associated with topographic features and thermal fronts but also for habitats with an extended euphotic zone and with large prey of the lower mesopelagic layer. For beaked whales, no SEAPODYM variable was selected in the best model that combined the two types of variables, possibly because SEAPODYM does not accurately simulate the organisms on which beaked whales feed on. For sperm whales, the increase model performance was only marginal. SEAPODYM outputs were at best weakly correlated with sightings of deep-diving cetaceans, suggesting SEAPODYM may not accurately predict the prey fields of these taxa. This study was a first investigation and mostly highlighted the importance of the physiographic variables to understand mechanisms that influence the distribution of deep-diving cetaceans. A more systematic use of SEAPODYM could allow to better define the limits of its use and a development of the model that would simulate larger prey beyond 1,000 m would probably better characterise the prey of deep-diving cetaceans.

Journal Title

PLoS ONE

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

16

Issue

8

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2021 Virgili et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Persistent link to this record
Citation

Virgili, A; Hedon, L; Authier, M; Calmettes, B; Claridge, D; Cole, T; Corkeron, P; Doremus, G; Dunn, C; Dunn, TE; Laran, S; Lehodey, P; Lewis, M; Louzao, M; Mannocci, L; et al., Towards a better characterisation of deep-diving whales' distributions by using prey distribution model outputs?, PLoS ONE, 2021, 16 (8)

Collections