Symbolic power, politics and teachers
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
In the book, Symbolic power, politics, and intellectuals: The political sociology of Pierre Bourdieu, David L. Swartz (2013) frames his discussion around the notion of power while focusing on Bourdieu’s ‘political sociology’,a ‘largely neglected’ aspect of Bourdieu’s work. Swartz (2013) suggests that Bourdieu offers a ‘sociology of politics’ as well as a ‘politics of sociology’. Therefore, sociology is a form of political engagement or as Bourdieu (2000a) suggests, ‘scholarship with commitment’ that enables a move towards ‘more just and democratic life’ (Swartz, 2013, p. i). This essay offers an outline of Swartz’s reading of Bourdieu’s political sociology using three of his ‘thinking tools’ and demonstrates the value of this book for analysing the cross-field effects of journalism and education (also see Lingard & Rawolle, 2004; Rawolle, 2005).
Journal Title
Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
36
Issue
4
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2015 Taylor & Francis (Routledge). This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Discourse on 16 Feb 2015, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1011866
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Education
Human society
Social Sciences
Education & Educational Research
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Baroutsis, A, Symbolic power, politics and teachers, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 2015, 36 (4), pp. 610-618