How veridical are different modalities of digital representation? The effect of presentation modality on physiological response

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Gero, John S
Shields, Jennifer
Yu, Rongrong
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)

Chien, SF

Choo, S

Schnabel, MA

Nakapan, W

Kim, MJ

Roudavski, S

Date
2016
Size
File type(s)
Location

Melbourne, AUSTRALIA

License
Abstract

This paper presents the methodology and results of a pilot study comparing the eye movements of architecture students when looking at different modalities of digital spatial representation. The two participant groups consisted of third and fourth year undergraduate architecture students from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA and from Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China. The two modalities studied were a computer-generated line drawn perspective and a digitized photograph of the same architectural space. The results of this study show that student designers’ physiological response varies with different representation modalities.

Journal Title
Conference Title

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-AIDED ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN RESEARCH IN ASIA (CAADRIA 2016)

Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2016 CAADRIA. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this conference please refer to the conference’s website or contact the author(s).

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Architecture not elsewhere classified

Persistent link to this record
Citation