Improved Shadow Removal for Robust Person Tracking in Surveillance Scenarios
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Sanderson, Conrad
Lovell, Brian C
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Istanbul, Turkey
License
Abstract
Shadow detection and removal is an important step employed after foreground detection, in order to improve the segmentation of objects for tracking. Methods reported in the literature typically have a significant trade-off between the shadow detection rate (classifying true shadow areas as shadows) and the shadow discrimination rate (discrimination between shadows and foreground). We propose a method that is able to achieve good performance in both cases, leading to improved tracking in surveillance scenarios. Chromacity information is first used to create a mask of candidate shadow pixels, followed by employing gradient information to remove foreground pixels that were incorrectly included in the mask. Experiments on the CAVIAR dataset indicate that the proposed method leads to considerable improvements in multiple object tracking precision and accuracy.
Journal Title
Conference Title
2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2010 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Sanin, A; Sanderson, C; Lovell, BC, Improved Shadow Removal for Robust Person Tracking in Surveillance Scenarios, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2010, pp. 141-144