Caesarean section births for twins: rational choice, or a non-evidence-based intervention that may cause harm?

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Ellwood, David A
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2019
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

The benefits and risks of birth by caesarean section are debated, with passionate proponents on each side of the discussion.1 The most recent national data (for 2017) indicate that in Australia more than one‐third of babies (35%) were born after caesarean section.2 While its safety has undoubtedly improved, it is still reported that greater maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality are associated with caesarean section than with vaginal births.3 The longer term health outcomes for mother and child are also important.4 In this issue of the MJA, Liu and her colleagues5 report that the caesarean rate for twin pregnancies in Victoria has almost tripled over the past three decades, and that the most frequent reason for operative intervention was the twin pregnancy itself. It is pertinent to examine the reasons for this trend and to ask whether it is justified.

Journal Title

Medical Journal of Australia

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note

This publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version

Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Biomedical and clinical sciences

Clinical sciences

Psychology

Obstetrics

Pregnancy complications

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Ellwood, DA, Caesarean section births for twins: rational choice, or a non-evidence-based intervention that may cause harm?, Medical Journal of Australia, 2019

Collections