Although a growing number of studies have reported microplastics (MPs) in biosolids and soils, there are significant differences in the concentrations found across different regions worldwide. This has raised questions about the quality of studies due to a lack of standardized sampling and analysis methods for detecting MPs in such complex samples. In this study, we applied a systematic quantitative literature review (SQLR) methodology to analyze studies reporting MPs in sludge/biosolids and agricultural soils. We also assessed the quality of individual studies on MPs in sludge/biosolids and soils based on the inclusion of quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures. There is limited understanding about MPs in soils with a history of biosolid application with only 9% of publications reporting MPs in biosolid-amended soil. There was almost eight orders of magnitude difference (3.4 × 10−5 to 9.4 × 103 particles/g) between the highest concentrations of MPs in sludge/biosolid samples compared to the lowest virgin soil samples. The literature shows a consistency in the polymer types (polyester, PP and PE) and morphotypes (fibres and fragments) of MPs most frequently detected in biosolids and soils, suggesting a potential role of biosolids in soils MP pollution. Despite the large variations in the sizes of MPs, there was a negative correlation between the lowest size detected and concentrations reported. This indicates that current concentrations of MPs are influenced by the detection size. Our assessment shows that the majority of studies to-date lack critical QA/QC measures, particularly field blank, positive control and method validation. This highlights an urgent need for quality improvement of future research in this field to produce reliable data, ultimately crucial to assess the risk of MPs and derive suitable environmental guidelines. It is recommended that MPs studies methodically include QA/QC protocols at every step of the process to ensure the integrity of the data that is published.