Global History, the Role of Scientific Discovery and the 'Needham Question': Europe and China in the Sixteenth to Nineteenth Centuries

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Mackerras, Colin
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)

Garcia, Manuel Perez

De Sousa, Lucio

Date
2018
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract

The chapter analyses reasons why the scientific revolution that has so profoundly affected the modern world developed in Europe, not in China, which before the sixteenth century boasted a far more highly developed level of scientific knowledge than was the case in Europe. It proceeds from the work of the great British scientist Joseph Needham (1900–1995), who masterminded the multi-volume Science and Civilisation in China series. The reasons for the difference between Europe and China include material factors such as the physical environment. However, this chapter focuses more on the philosophical and cultural factors, including negative factors in China such as Confucian bureaucratism. It argues that comparative science is a topic of the utmost importance for global history.

Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title

Global History and New Polycentric Approaches: Europe, Asia and the Americas in a World Network System

Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2018 The Authors. This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Other human society

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections