Understanding the experiences of neurodivergent research students: a mixed methods systematic review
File version
Author(s)
Edwards, Chris
Mewburn, Inger
Simpson, Kate
Webster, Amanda A
Brownlow, Charlotte
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Research on neurodivergent students in Higher Education has increased but primarily focuses on coursework students, overlooking those in research degrees. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review about the experience of neurodivergent research students which included a mix of empirical research and reflections on lived experience. Our analysis of 31 included articles identified eight key themes shaping these students’ journeys: (1) academic cultures, structures, and expectations; (2) sensory and environmental challenges; (3) executive functioning; (4) insufficient supports and accommodations; (5) relationships with others; (6) ableism and disclosure; (7) mental health; and (8) embracing neurodivergence. Although some strengths of neurodivergent thinking were noted, significant institutional barriers persist. These findings reveal critical gaps in academic inclusivity and highlight the urgent need for systemic changes to develop research degree programmes that recognise, support, and empower neurodivergent students. The review offers actionable insights for fostering more equitable and inclusive higher education environments.
Journal Title
Studies in Higher Education
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
This publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advance online version.
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Tan, DW; Edwards, C; Mewburn, I; Simpson, K; Webster, AA; Brownlow, C, Understanding the experiences of neurodivergent research students: a mixed methods systematic review, Studies in Higher Education, 2025