Planning Practice and Academic Research: Views from the Parallel Worlds

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Accepted Manuscript (AM)

Author(s)
Goodman, R
Freestone, R
Burton, P
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2017
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Despite their different roles, academic and professional planners share many common goals. Both are concerned with the future of cities, and committed to goals of sustainability, equity and prosperity. Many academics hope to contribute knowledge that will influence practice and many practitioners wish to draw upon current research to promulgate best practice. Yet while this symbiotic relationship may appear clear in principle, in practice the two groups find it difficult to connect. This paper reports on a survey of planners in Australia and New Zealand, which asked respondents to consider the state of the theory/practice divide and suggest some solutions.

Journal Title

Planning Practice and Research

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2017 Taylor & Francis (Routledge). This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Planning Practice and Research on 29 Sep 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02697459.2017.1378970

Item Access Status
Note

This publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version.

Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Urban and regional planning

Urban and regional planning not elsewhere classified

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections