The Industrial Relations Policy and Penalty

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Peetz, David
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)

Gauja, Anika

Chen, Peter

Curtin, Jennifer

Pietsch, Juliet

Date
2018
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract

This chapter examines the role of industrial relations (IR) in the 2016 election, one that featured campaigns by and about (that is, against) trade unions. I commence with a brief history of industrial relations in Australian elections over several decades, including the 2007 ‘Your Rights at Work’ (YRAW) campaign. I then discuss the parties’ positioning on IR in the lead-up to the election over 2013–15, including two major inquiry reports. This is followed by the role played by key IR issues in the double dissolution, and the subsequent 2016 campaign—union misbehaviour, penalty rates and the Country Fire Authority (CFA) dispute—including a discussion of the union campaign against the government, with an assessment of its effectiveness and what might be seen as the industrial relations ‘penalty’ during the campaign.

Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title

Double Disillusion: The 2016 Australian Federal Election

Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© The Author(s) 2018. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Business and Management not elsewhere classified

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections