Dose and setting of rehabilitation received after stroke in Queensland, Australia: a prospective cohort study.

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Grimley, Rohan S
Rosbergen, Ingrid CM
Gustafsson, Louise
Horton, Eleanor
Green, Theresa
Cadigan, Greg
Kuys, Suzanne
Andrew, Nadine E
Cadilhac, Dominique A
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to describe patterns and dose of rehabilitation received following stroke and to investigate their relationship with outcomes. DESIGN: This was a prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: A total of seven public hospitals and all subsequent rehabilitation services in Queensland, Australia, participated in the study. SUBJECTS: Participants were consecutive patients surviving acute stroke between July 2016 and January 2017. METHODS: We tracked rehabilitation for six months following stroke and obtained 90- to 180-day outcomes from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry. MEASURES: Dose of rehabilitation - time in therapy by physiotherapy, occupational therapy and speech pathology; modified Rankin Scale (mRS)- premorbid, acute care discharge and 90- to 180-day follow-up. RESULTS: We recruited 504 patients, of whom 337 (median age = 73 years, 41% female) received 643 episodes of rehabilitation in 83 different services. Initial rehabilitation was predominantly inpatient (260/337, 77%) versus community-based (77/337, 21%). Therapy time was greater within inpatient services (median = 29 hours) compared to community-based (6 hours) or transition care (16 hours). Median (Quartile 1, Quartile 3) six-month cumulative therapy time was 73 hours (40, 130) when rehabilitation commenced in stroke units and continued in inpatient rehabilitation units; 43 hours (23, 78) when commenced in inpatient rehabilitation units; and 5 hours (2, 9) with only community rehabilitation. In 317 of 504 (63%) with follow-up data, improvement in mRS was most likely with inpatient rehabilitation (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.7-7.7), lower with community rehabilitation (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.7-3.8) compared to no rehabilitation, after adjustment for baseline factors. CONCLUSION: Amount of therapy varied widely between rehabilitation pathways. Amount of therapy and chance of improvement in function were highest with inpatient rehabilitation.

Journal Title

Clin Rehabil

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note

This publication was entered as an advanced online version.

Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Biomedical and clinical sciences

Clinical sciences

Cerebrovascular disease/stroke

health services research

outcomes

rehabilitation

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Grimley, RS; Rosbergen, IC; Gustafsson, L; Horton, E; Green, T; Cadigan, G; Kuys, S; Andrew, NE; Cadilhac, DA, Dose and setting of rehabilitation received after stroke in Queensland, Australia: a prospective cohort study., Clin Rehabil, 2020

Collections