Traditions, symbols, and the challenges of researching the legal profession: the case of the cab rank rule and the Bar’s responses
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
The English Bar sets great store by traditions and symbols. One of these, the cab rank rule, is considered above reproach. The author was commissioned to examine the working of the rule by the Legal Services Board. The resulting analysis caused much indignation among the Bar with a complete rejection of the research. This article discusses from sociological and economic perspectives how the rule functions and why the Bar was unable to engage positively. It also examines various issues in doing research on the legal profession by looking at other researchers’ histories, how the legal profession is averse to change and modernisation and clings to a manufactured sense of tradition. Any challenge to the profession’s symbolic order is perceived as a threat rather than a moment of reflection.
Journal Title
International Journal of the Legal Profession
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in the International Journal of the Legal Profession, 29 Sep 2021, copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2021.1978451
Item Access Status
Note
This publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advanced online version.
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Sociology
Law and society and socio-legal research
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Flood, J, Traditions, symbols, and the challenges of researching the legal profession: the case of the cab rank rule and the Bar’s responses, International Journal of the Legal Profession