Population attributable fraction: Names, types and issues with incorrect interpretation of relative risks (Editorial)

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Zapata-Diomedi, Belen
Barendregt, Jan J
Veerman, J Lennert
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2018
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

The development of the original population attributable fraction (PAF) dates back to 19531 and it has been widely used, misused and miscalled since then. We discuss two main issues here: use of appropriate terminology and calculations of the PAF, and of the potential impact fraction (PIF).

Journal Title

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

52

Issue

4

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Engineering

Biomedical and clinical sciences

Education

Clinical sciences

Sports science and exercise

Applied and developmental psychology

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Sport Sciences

DISEASE

HEALTH

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Zapata-Diomedi, B; Barendregt, JJ; Veerman, JL, Population attributable fraction: Names, types and issues with incorrect interpretation of relative risks (Editorial), British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2018, 52 (4), pp. 212-213

Collections