The theological-bureaucratic science fiction of Philip K. Dick and Carl Schmitt: An economic theology of omniscience in The Buribunks
File version
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Bikundo, Edwin
Tranter, Kieran
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
This chapter argues that whereas Schmitt’s Political Theology articulates the way in which sovereignty as a paradigm has drawn upon and secularises the theological concept of God as divine sovereign, his Die Buribunken elaborates a form of economic theology. This is internalised in the Buribunks’ ever-present bureaucratic recording and writing, but also in the sense of the all-seeing sovereign who would be able to read this ever-present and comprehensive archive. If Schmitt’s writing at the time is both a working through of the issues of political theology with reference to the Catholic Church, sovereignty and the law, his fictional intervention involves an alternative response to Max Weber and his theses on the bureaucratisation and disenchantment of modernity. This chapter positions Schmitt’s Die Buribunken as a science fiction meditation on the economic theological conception of omniscience against the science fiction of Philip K. Dick, arguing that each involves a debate over the nature of the theological, the bureaucratic and the economic, which is prescient of our digital modernity.
Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title
Carl Schmitt and The Buribunks: Technology, Law, Literature
Edition
1st
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Law, science and technology
Marketing technology
Comparative and transnational literature
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Peters, TD, The theological-bureaucratic science fiction of Philip K. Dick and Carl Schmitt: An economic theology of omniscience in The Buribunks, Carl Schmitt and The Buribunks: Technology, Law, Literature, 2022, pp. 60-80