Exploring the Benefits of Data Mining on Juvenile Justice Data

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Gray, Brett
Birks, Daniel
Allard, Troy
Ogilvie, James
Stewart, Anna
Lewis, Andrew
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2008
Size

464108 bytes

File type(s)

application/pdf

Location
License
Abstract

Risk assessment procedures occupy a central role in the criminal justice system decision making process and typically involve a prediction about the likelihood that an individual will re-offend (Bonta, 1996, 2002; Gottfredson, 1987; Gottfredson & Moriarty, 2006; Hoge, 2002; Taxman, Cropsey, Young, & Wexler, 2007; Taxman & Thanner, 2006). The efficiency of risk assessment tools is determined largely by the predictive accuracy of the underlying analytical techniques and any improvement in accuracy is likely to result in significant benefits for public safety and offender rehabilitation. While risk assessment tools have typically been developed using traditional statistical techniques such as regression models that involve testing relationships to provide evidence for or against a given hypothesis, advances in the development of statistical computation techniques in the Information Technology (IT) fields of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) have the potential to improve the predictive accuracy of risk assessments in criminal justice (Caulkins, Cohen, Gorr, & Wei, 1996; Palocsay, Wang, & Brookshire, 2000). The aim of the project was to apply techniques from the field of KDD (neural networks and decision trees) to criminal justice data to determine whether these techniques could be used to improve the predictive accuracy of models developed to predict risk of re-offending over base cases and commonly applied statistical methods. To accomplish this aim, the predictive accuracy of base cases, models developed using traditional statistical techniques, and models developed using neural networks and decision trees that predicted juvenile re-offending were compared.

Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© The Author(s) 2008. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. It is posted here with permission of the copyright owner's for your personal use only. No further distribution permitted. For information about this journal please refer to the publisher's website or contact the author's.

© 2008 Griffith University

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Law and Legal Studies not elsewhere classified

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections