Preschool children overimitate robots, but do so less than they overimitate humans

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Sommer, Kristyn
Davidson, Rebecca
Armitage, Kristy L
Slaughter, Virginia
Wiles, Janet
Nielsen, Mark
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Past research has indicated that young children have a propensity to adopt the causally unnecessary actions of an adult, a phenomenon known as overimitation. Among competing perspectives, social accounts suggest that overimitation satisfies social motivations, be they affiliative or normative, whereas the “copy-all/refine-later” account proposes that overimitation serves a functional purpose by giving children the greatest opportunity to acquire knowledge with little error. Until recently, these two accounts have been difficult to extricate experimentally, but the development of humanoid robots provides a novel test. Here we document that children overimitate robots, but to a lesser degree than humans and regardless of whether the redundant actions are seen to be ritualistic or functional. These results are best explained with a combined account of overimitation, whereby children approach a learning task with a copy-all/refine-later motivation, but the fidelity of the reproduction of novel behaviors is modulated by the social availability of the demonstrator.

Journal Title

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

191

Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Psychology

Cognitive and computational psychology

Sociology and social studies of science and technology

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Sommer, K; Davidson, R; Armitage, KL; Slaughter, V; Wiles, J; Nielsen, M, Preschool children overimitate robots, but do so less than they overimitate humans, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2020, 191, pp. 104702

Collections