“Poison” or “protection”? A mixed methods exploration of Australian parents' COVID-19 vaccination intentions

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Evans, S
Klas, A
Mikocka-Walus, A
German, B
Rogers, GD
Ling, M
Fernando, JW
Kothe, E
Westrupp, EM
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2021
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Objective: The success of COVID-19 vaccination programs relies on community attitudes, yet little is known about parents' views. We aimed to explore the reasons behind Australian parents' vaccine intentions for themselves and for their children. Method: This mixed methods study relates to Wave 13 (January 2021) of a longitudinal study of Australian parents' experiences during COVID-19 and contained 1094 participants (83% mothers). We used multinomial logistic regression to understand demographic predictors of vaccine intention, and a descriptive template thematic analysis to analyse open-ended questions about parents' reasons for vaccine intentions for themselves and their children. Results: 64% of Australian parents intend on vaccination, 26% are unsure and 9% intend to decline; 48% intend to vaccinate their children, 38% are unsure, and 14% intend to decline. Relative to those intending to vaccinate, parents unsure (OR = -0.63, 95% CI: 0.46, −0.84, p = .002) or not intending (OR = -0.41, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.67 p < .001) to vaccinate were more likely to have lower trust in doctors. Similar predictors emerged for parents who did not intend to vaccinate their children (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31, 0.70, p < .001). Qualitative data indicated that many parents had not made a firm decision, including a lack of alignment between intentions and reasons. For example, parents who said ‘yes’ to vaccination, often then expressed hesitance and a focus on risks in their written response. Reasons for hesitancy for themselves included concerns about testing, side effects, and long-term outcomes. Similar themes were present for children, but parents expressed a strong desire to protect their children, and an eagerness for health information. Conclusion: Based on prior research and the themes identified here, a multipronged campaign that includes education/promotion, good access to vaccines and role models, is likely to support parents to make informed decisions regarding COVID-19 vaccination.

Journal Title

Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

150

Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Public health

Psychology

Sociology of health

COVID-19

Parents

Qualitative survey

Vaccination intentions

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Evans, S; Klas, A; Mikocka-Walus, A; German, B; Rogers, GD; Ling, M; Fernando, JW; Kothe, E; Westrupp, EM, “Poison” or “protection”? A mixed methods exploration of Australian parents' COVID-19 vaccination intentions, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2021, 150, pp. 110626

Collections