Is FLIP enough? or should we use the FLIPPED model instead?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Chen, Yunglung
Wang, Yuping
Kinshuk
Chen, Nian-Shing
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2014
Size

22111 bytes

File type(s)

application/pdf

Location
License
Abstract

The flipped learning model, which "flips" traditional in-class lectures with collaborative activities, has gained many followers and converts in K-12 education. However, a review of previous studies shows that the flipped model is still underutilized and underexplored in the higher education context. Research and design models for flipped learning in higher education are also insufficient. This study attempts to fill this gap by developing a model that can provide a foundation for further research and practice for flipped learning in higher education. Building from the four pillars of F-L-I-P頨Flexible Environments, Learning Culture, Intentional Content, and Professional Educators), the proposed research and design model named "FLIPPED" adds three extra lettersdP-E-D (Progressive Activities, Engaging Experiences, and Diversified Platforms)dto the F-L-I-P頡cronym. This model was implemented in a "Holistic Flipped Classroom" environment and evaluated based on a student survey, interviews, and an analysis of computer system logs. Findings demonstrated that the proposed model was effective; students reported that they were satisfied with the course, their attendance improved, and their study efforts increased. Results also suggested that the transactional distance changed during the learning process: highly motivated students performed much better than less motivated students. However, some students retained their former passive learning habits, and this resulted in an obstruction to full adoption. Reflections on the achievements and challenges of the "FLIPPED" model have culminated in various examples, guidelines, and suggestions for practitioners as they consider their own design, implementation, and adoption.1

Journal Title

Computers & Education

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

79

Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2014 Elsevier. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Education systems

Curriculum and pedagogy

Curriculum and pedagogy not elsewhere classified

Specialist studies in education

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections