Recovering Justice: Political Legitimacy Reconsidered

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Kane, J
Patapan, H
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2010
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Democratic leaders confront a core dilemma in international relations. They favor democracies but know that the legitimacy of stable nondemocratic states is guaranteed under principles of state sovereignty and nonintervention. They therefore seem forced to either one extreme or another-to a de facto accommodation with nondemocracies that seems amoral, or to a missionary zeal for democratic change that seems perversely imperialistic. In this article we argue that these positions, the "realistic" and the "idealistic," represent a false dichotomy generated by what we term the first and second moments of legitimacy, respectively. These moments-the first resting on international stability, the second on democracy-have been in historical contest for centuries. We argue the need for a third moment-of legitimacy as justice-to surmount the limitations of these options and the false choice they present, making room for the exercise of a prudent international leadership.

Journal Title

Politics & Policy

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

38

Issue

3

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

Self-archiving of the author-manuscript version is not yet supported by this journal. Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version or contact the authors for more information.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Political science

Policy and administration

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections