How (Should) we evaluate DRT’s impact on social equity?
File version
Author(s)
Burke, Matthew
Leung, Abraham
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Washington, USA
License
Abstract
Demand responsive transport (DRT) has been touted as a panacea for suburban public transport woes, providing efficient service in low-density environments. A review of the DRT literature published in English language journals identified 29 papers that examined the effect of these services on social equity. All studies examined the impact of age on DRT usage, while disability (25 papers) and gender (15 papers) were major interests. This research was predominantly completed in the Anglosphere, with the UK (34%), the US (31%), and Australia (14%) dominant. While DRT can take many forms, there is limited research into the best ways to provide these services in various environments to best promote social equity. That said, DRT services generally increase the quality of life for the disadvantaged served in suburban and rural areas, where it has been implemented. A research agenda based on the results of this study suggests ways forward to improve understanding of equity outcomes from DRT service provision.
Journal Title
Conference Title
99th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Self-archiving of the author-manuscript version is not yet supported by this publisher. Please refer to the conference link for access to the definitive, published version or contact the author for more information.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Transportation, logistics and supply chains
Other human society
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Kaufman, B; Burke, M; Leung, A, How (Should) we evaluate DRT’s impact on social equity?, 2020