Interpreting systematic reviews: Looking beyond the all too familiar conclusion (Editorial)
File version
Author(s)
Johnston, Venerina
Cert, Grad
Coppieters, Michel W
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Due to the large volume of research, therapists often turn to systematic reviews for treatment directions. We expect that these comprehensive syntheses of the literature will provide unambiguous recommendations for the implementation of a particular intervention. However, the conclusions of systematic reviews often leave us feeling unsatisfied because of the absence of clear recommendations due to the paucity of high quality evidence. The aim of this editorial is to provide some guidance for therapists and researchers when faced with a systematic review with inconclusive recommendations. We will use our recent Cochrane systematic review1 as an example.
Journal Title
Journal of Hand Therapy
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
27
Issue
1
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Clinical sciences
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Orthopedics
Rehabilitation
Surgery
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Peters, SE; Johnston, V; Cert, G; Coppieters, MW, Interpreting systematic reviews: Looking beyond the all too familiar conclusion (Editorial), Journal of Hand Therapy, 2014, 27 (1), pp. 1-3