Management practices in early-stage (I/II) follicular lymphoma (FL) are variable and include radiation (RT), systemic therapy, or combined modality therapy (CMT). There is a paucity of data regarding maintenance rituximab in this cohort. We conducted an international retrospective study of patients with newly diagnosed early-stage FL staged with positron emission tomography (PET)–computed tomography and bone marrow biopsy. Three hundred sixty-five patients (stage I, n 5 221), median age 63 years, treated from 2005-2017 were included, with a median follow-up of 45 months. Management included watchful waiting (WW; n 5 85) and active treatment (n 5 280). The latter consisted of RT alone (n 5 171) or systemic therapy (immunochemotherapy [n 5 63] or CMT [n 5 46]). Forty-nine systemically treated patients received maintenance rituximab; 72.7% of stage I patients received RT alone, compared to 42.6% with stage II (P, .001). Active therapies yielded comparable overall response rates (P 5 .87). RT alone and systemic therapy without maintenance rituximab yielded similar progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-2.34; P 5 .96). Maintenance rituximab improved PFS (HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.095-0.64; P 5 .017). The incidence of transformation was lower with systemic therapy compared to RT or WW (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.070-0.61; P 5 .034). Overall survival was similar among all practices, including WW (P 5 .40). In the largest comparative assessment of management practices in the modern era, variable practices each resulted in similar excellent outcomes. Randomized studies are required to determine the optimal treatment in early-stage FL.