Integration of science and monitoring of river ecosystem health to guide investments in catchment protection and rehabilitation
Loading...
File version
Author(s)
Bunn, SE
Abal, EG
Smith, MJ
Choy, SC
Fellows, CS
Harch, BD
Kennard, MJ
Sheldon, F
Abal, EG
Smith, MJ
Choy, SC
Fellows, CS
Harch, BD
Kennard, MJ
Sheldon, F
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2010
Size
208653 bytes
File type(s)
application/pdf
Location
License
Abstract
- Stream ecosystem health monitoring and reporting need to be developed in the context of an adaptive process that is clearly linked to identified values and objectives, is informed by rigorous science, guides management actions and is responsive to changing perceptions and values of stakeholders. To be effective, monitoring programmes also need to be underpinned by an understanding of the probable causal factors that influence the condition or health of important environmental assets and values. This is often difficult in stream and river ecosystems where multiple stressors, acting at different spatial and temporal scales, interact to affect water quality, biodiversity and ecosystem processes. 2. In this article, we describe the development of a freshwater monitoring programme in South East Queensland, Australia, and how this has been used to report on ecosystem health at a regional scale and to guide investments in catchment protection and rehabilitation. We also discuss some of the emerging science needs to identify the appropriate scale and spatial arrangement of rehabilitation to maximise river ecosystem health outcomes and, at the same time, derive other benefits downstream. 3. An objective process was used to identify potential indicators of stream ecosystem health and then test these across a known catchment land-use disturbance gradient. From the 75 indicators initially tested, 22 from five indicator groups (water quality, ecosystem metabolism, nutrient cycling, invertebrates and fish) responded strongly to the disturbance gradient, and 16 were subsequently recommended for inclusion in the monitoring programme. The freshwater monitoring programme was implemented in 2002, funded by local and State government authorities, and currently involves the assessment of over 120 sites, twice per year. This information, together with data from a similar programme on the region's estuarine and coastal marine waters, forms the basis of an annual report card that is presented in a public ceremony to local politicians and the broader community. 4. Several key lessons from the SEQ Healthy Waterways Programme are likely to be transferable to other regional programmes aimed at improving aquatic ecosystem health, including the importance of a shared common vision, the involvement of committed individuals, a cooperative approach, the need for defensible science and effective communication.
Journal Title
Freshwater Biology
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
55
Issue
Suppl. 1
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing. This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: Integration of science and monitoring of river ecosystem health to guide investments in catchment protection and rehabilitation, Freshwater Biology Volume 55, Issue 1, 2010, 223-240, which has been published in final form at 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02375.x.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Environmental sciences
Ecosystem function
Environmental management
Biological sciences