A prosecutor’s guide to improving child witness interviews about alleged sexual abuse: A view from the Australian context
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Powell, Martine
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Child sexual abuse (CSA) cases are often not prosecuted because of poor evidential quality of the investigative interview, the central plank of CSA investigations and prosecutions. The current paper addresses the need for further direction about how investigative interviews can better meet the needs of prosecutors by presenting a transcript of interview with an experienced Crown prosecutor. In the interview, we asked the prosecutor to explain what information is required, and how information should be elicited from a prosecution perspective. The transcript was then distributed to nine Crown prosecutors who were invited to reflect on the propositions made in the transcript and indicate any areas where the prosecutor’s views were not consistent with their own. The nine prosecutors then met as a group and agreed on amendments to the transcript to ensure it was representative of their views. We present the final transcript (with amendments) as a tool for interviewers and trainers.
Journal Title
Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
5
Issue
1
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2013 iIIRG. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Forensic Psychology
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Burrows, K; Powell, M, A prosecutor’s guide to improving child witness interviews about alleged sexual abuse: A view from the Australian context, Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice, 2013, 5 (1), pp. 12-22