Alternative ways to pay? A review of non-government sources to fund bikeways

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Leung, A
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2018
Size
File type(s)
Location

Darwin, Australia

License
Abstract

Cycling is (re)gaining popularity in many developed countries and cities. However, a key issue is cyclist safety due to lack of safe cycling infrastructure. Many governments of low to medium growth economies are struggling to meet the many needs of public spending. Necessary cycle-related funding is often allocated to other projects, such as for roads or public transport. There is a strong impetus for transport authorities to find new sources of funding as general taxation revenue is limited. Examples of bikeways funded by communities or the private sector are emerging across the globe. This paper reviews some of these notable cases, evaluating the funding potential, feasibility, and acceptability of these schemes. Non-government sources may not be mainstream sources of funding yet, but they offer new avenues to help reduce the financial burden of transport/planning authorities to plan, build, and maintain bikeways. As many of the innovative cases feature strong community involvement, rallying public interest in cycling infrastructure development is a key ingredient of success in the alternative funding models examined.

Journal Title
Conference Title

ATRF 2018 - Australasian Transport Research Forum 2018, Proceedings

Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Transport planning

Persistent link to this record
Citation