Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations
File version
Author(s)
Troth, Ashlea C
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Authors are experiencing increasing competition for their articles to be published. One way of ensuring their work is given the best chance of being published is to underpin their research with rigorous methods that are characterized by robustness, accuracy and reliability. A common factor that can stymie research rigour is common method bias. Our aim in this article is to outline the nature of, concerns about and examine reasons why researchers still conduct studies that are susceptible to common method bias. We also provide some solutions for avoiding or managing common method bias concerns. In doing this, we acknowledge the substantial work that has been produced on this topic to date and, therefore, focus our contribution specifically on issues that affect research in applied and managerial settings.
Journal Title
Australian Journal of Management
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
45
Issue
1
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Commerce, management, tourism and services
Social Sciences
Business
Management
Business & Economics
Applied research
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Jordan, PJ; Troth, AC, Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations, Australian Journal of Management, 2019, 45 (1), pp. 3-14