Assessment of cultural safety in a post–Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) era
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Gupta, TS
Evans, R
Ward, R
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Background As The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) introduces alternatives to the Objective Structured Clinical Examination, it is imperative that standards are continually set for a culturally safe general practice workforce. Assessments have many functions and should be continually reviewed to ensure that they require general practitioners (GPs) to demonstrate genuine cultural safety. Objective The aim of this article is to highlight the complexities in assessing the cultural safety of GPs when consulting with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Discussion Presently there is a lack of validated approaches for assessing cultural safety of GPs. This creates challenges for the RACGP in redesigning fellowship examinations. Yet in this challenge is an opportunity to consider assessment design that is not competency based, amplifies Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples' voices and reflects the complexity of cultural safety
Journal Title
Australian Journal of General Practice
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
51
Issue
1-Feb
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Brumpton, K; Gupta, TS; Evans, R; Ward, R, Assessment of cultural safety in a post–Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) era, Australian Journal of General Practice, 51 (1-2), pp. 90-93, 2022. Available at https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-08-21-6120
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
General practice
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Brumpton, K; Gupta, TS; Evans, R; Ward, R, Assessment of cultural safety in a post–Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) era, Australian Journal of General Practice, 2022, 51 (1-2), pp. 90-93