An Agenda to Construct an Improved Understanding of Australian Organic Consumers
File version
Author(s)
Lyons, Kristen
Winzar, Hume
Rundle-Thiele, Sharon
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Maree Thyne, Kenneth Deans, Juergen Gnoth
Date
Size
24847 bytes
52845 bytes
File type(s)
text/plain
application/pdf
Location
University of Otago,Dunedin, New Zealand
License
Abstract
Organic food is claimed to be one of the fastest growing food categories worldwide, with growth rates of 20-30%. There have been considerable research efforts globally seeking to understand the organic food consumer. To date, academic research has been unable to reach a consensus, and we remain incapable of adequately describing who buys and importantly why consumers choose to buy organic food products. The objective of this paper is to examine the merits of using an alternate method to better understand organic food consumers. It is proposed that the Best Worst scaling method be used as a methodological framework to guide research about organic purchasing decisions. The Best Worst scaling method avoids issues related to Socially Desirable Responding; a known effect of using the ever-popular Likert scale.
Journal Title
Conference Title
ANZMAC 2007 Conference: 3Rs reputation responsibility relevance
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© The Author(s) 2007. The attached file is posted here with permission of the copyright owners for your personal use only. No further distribution permitted. For information about this conference please refer to the publisher's website or contact the authors.