Could master protocols be adapted for effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies?
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Massey-Swindle, Taren
Arnautovska, Urska
Hickman, Ingrid J
Wheeler, Amanda J
Siskind, Dan
Deenik, Jeroen
Ware, Robert S
Roberts, James A
Lee, Yong Yi
Milton, Alyssa
Marx, Wolfgang
Wood, Stephen J
Rutherford, Zoe
Kaylor-Hughes, Catherine
et al.
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
Background Master protocols leverage a common trial infrastructure for launching multiple sub-studies. Translational research aims to progress scientific discoveries toward public health impact, which depends on establishing an intervention’s efficacy, effectiveness in real-world conditions, and successful strategies for implementation. While master protocols have been designed to improve the efficiency of clinical trials as sub-studies addressing a particular disease, their application with effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies is yet to be explored. The aim of this study was to develop recommendations for adapting mater protocol methods for effectiveness-implementation research.
Methods A method of consultation with translational research networks was undertaken between January and December 2024. Consideration was given to the requirements for service providers to engage in translational research, and how master protocols could support effectiveness-implementation hybrid sub-studies. The underlying rationale for potential adaptations is provided with reference to implementation frameworks, discussion of advantages and disadvantages, and summary recommendations.
Results Recommendations are proposed on establishing common trial infrastructure, aims and hypotheses, data collection, control groups, adaptive elements, and eligibility criteria. By leveraging cross-sectoral partnerships, co-producing research and dissemination, and incorporating adaptive elements, master protocols may offer a promising approach for accelerating progress along the translational research pipeline.
Conclusions The adaptation of master protocols for hybrid sub-studies could enable evidence-based interventions to be more effectively implemented in routine care settings. The feasibility of master protocols for effectiveness-implementation research is yet to be tested, and further development in this area is needed to trial the proposed methodology.
Journal Title
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
25
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Epidemiology
Public health
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Chapman, JJ; Massey-Swindle, T; Arnautovska, U; Hickman, IJ; Wheeler, AJ; Siskind, D; Deenik, J; Ware, RS; Roberts, JA; Lee, YY; Milton, A; Marx, W; Wood, SJ; Rutherford, Z; Kaylor-Hughes, C; Trott, M; Iyer, R, Could master protocols be adapted for effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies?, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 25, pp. 258